A Macedonian Phalanx fighting the Roman legions. sie zum Pfeiler seines Eroberungszuges durch Asien machte. It was one of the most successful infantry formations of the ancient world, only rivalled by the manipular formation of the Roman legions. And hence, it takes a more skilled commander with an integrated army to be able to use it effectively. [1] The phalangites also had a smaller and flatter shield than that of the Greek hoplon, measuring about 24 inches and weighing about 12 pounds. It also allowed a higher proportion of the soldiers to be actively engage… There were always full bronze panoplies mixed with lighter, cheaper panoplies. Re: greeks phalanx vs macedonian phalanx? The Macedonian pike phalanx dominated the battlefields of Greece and the Near and Middle East for over two centuries. Like the Greek phalanx, only those in the front ranks wore body armour, with the most common protection being a helmet for those in the rear. Die Makedonische Phalanx war eine schwere Infanterieformation von hoher militärgeschichtlicher Bedeutung für die Staaten der antiken hellenistischen Epoche. Shop our range of T-Shirts, Tanks, Hoodies, Dresses, and more. Tried a search but nothing came up. Phalanx fighting on a black-figure amphora, c. 560 BC. For the record, by Greek phalanx I mean hoplites equipped with an aspis, a dory, a xiphos, a bronze cuirass and a Corinthian helmet, and by Macedonian phalanx I mean phalangites equipped with a sarissa, a small shield and … Phalanx vs Larynx - What's the difference? Peter Connolly captures the action as the phalanx pins and pushes back the Romans on the level ground. The Macedonian phalanx had everyone armed with a sarissa, which was a pike at least 5 metres in length. 750–350 BC) was a formation in which the hoplites would line up in ranks in close order. They never really fought against heavy cavalry that I can tell. While no single fighting force has ever not been beat, human history is filled with many strong types of soldier, like the Greek Hoplite. They were two-handed; the smaller shields were slung over the left shoulder. As nouns the difference between phalanx and pharynx is that phalanx is a large group of people, animals or things, compact or closely massed, or tightly knit and united in common purpose while pharynx is (anatomy) the part of the alimentary canal that extends from the mouth and nasal cavities to the larynx, where it becomes continuous with the esophagus. Macedonian phalanx, pikes up - a still from Oliver Stone's Alexander. Phalanx vs Digit - What's the difference? The Macedonian phalanx advantage was protection, but it had disadvantages. [5] The secondary weapon was a shortsword called a xiphos. In June 197, at Cynoscephalae, the Roman commander Titus Quinctus Flamininus overcame the Macedonian king Philip V, and the Greek historian Polybius of Megalopolis concluded that this battle was the best example to show that legions were superior to the phalanx. That is one of the main reason that late sparta during it's reforms were changing over there normal hoplites into sarrisa phalanx troops (not completely but some were reformed). Reason being is phalangites were meant to hold the enemy lines in place while heavy horse circled in and smashed the rear or flanks. Phalanxes remained dominant on battlefields throughout the Ancient Macedonian Period, although wars had developed into more protracted operations generally involving sieges and naval combat as much as pitched battles, until they were ultimately displaced by the Roman legions. As nouns the difference between phalanx and phalangeal is that phalanx is a large group of people, animals or things, compact or closely massed, or tightly knit and united in common purpose while phalangeal is (anatomy) a phalange (bone of a finger or toe). And I don't agree with a poster who claimed that Philip's victory was that of a professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia. The Greek Hoplite. ... An ancient Greek and Macedonian military unit that consisted of several ranks and files (lines) of soldiers in close array with joined shields and long spears. They were covered by half of their shield and half by the soldier next to them's shield. From the hardened Illyrians in the west, to the Greek city states to the south, none could match Philip’s disciplined sarissa-wielding infantry. The phalanx therefore presented a shield wall and a mass of spear points to the enemy, making frontal assaults against it very difficult. It was one of the most successful infantry formations of the ancient world, only rivalled by the manipular formation of the Roman legions. Hoplite Phalanx Weaknesses. We have to remember that Alexander’s army only had a small portion of phalangites relative to the rest of the army. The Macedonian Empire of King Philip II, prior to his victory at Chaeronea in 338 BC. The Macedonian phalanx wins easily and its not even close regardless of the knight’s equipment, formation, leadership or tactics. Phalanxes remained dominant on battlefields throughout the Ancient Macedonian Period, although wars had developed into more protracted operations generally involving sieges and naval combat as much as pitched battles, until they were ultimately displaced by the Roman legions. Could it have been possible for a traditional Greek Phalanx to defeat the Macedonian phalanx, and win the battle of … [2] Philip's military reforms were a new approach to the current hoplite warfare which focused on their shield, the hoplon; his focus was on a new weapon, the sarissa. Macedonian phalanx vs. Greek phalanx. ... An ancient Greek and Macedonian military unit that consisted of several ranks and files (lines) of soldiers in close array with joined shields and long spears. Macedonian phalanx was more powerful but more specialized troops. The last thing to note about the phalanx is its weaknesses. Classical Greece and Ancient Greek Warfare - (2016) #139: The Feared Macedonian Phalanx A blog about ancient Greek warfare, mythology, archaeology, including the … [4] At close range such large weapons were of little use, but an intact phalanx could easily keep its enemies at a distance. Arising at some point toward the end of the Dark Ages (approximately 800 BCE to 600 B… [1] The phalanx was later changed to a 16 by 16 formation, and while the date for this change is still unknown, it occurred before 331 under Philip’s rule. I'm often asked questions such as this: In 359 BC, following the Macedonian defeat from the Illyrians, which killed the majority of Macedonia's army and the current King Perdiccas III, Perdiccas' brother Philip II took the throne. (historical sociology) A Fourierite utopian community; a phalanstery. As a verb digit is to point at or point out with the finger. [1] The first phalanx was a 10 by 10 square with very few experienced troops. The formation was made up of spearmen carrying 18 to 20 ft (5.5–6 m) long spears. The Roman Maniple vs. However, it would be far easier for the Greek one to turn around and redeploy, drilled or not; that is incontrovertible. The phalanx evolved. Even a minimally equipped and trained phalanx was still a … Ancient Rome Ancient Greece. The Macedonian Phalanx was built to fight against the Greek Phalanx. The basic tactic was the man behind put his shield against the back of the man in front and pushed. Besides classical hoplites Hellenistic nations began to field two new types of hoplites, the Thureophoroi and the Thorakitai. The standard Byzantine phalanx had adopted the Hellenistic system of combat called the Chiliarchy that was generally made up of 650 skutatoi and 350 toxotai. These were called sarissas. Well, given that Phillip copied the Theban phalanx and made some changes to its equipment, I wouldn't say that the rest of the Greeks were terrified. [2] The phalanx was divided into taxis based on geographical recruitment differences.[2]. The Histories, Book XVIII, Chapters 28-32: In my sixth book I made a promise, still unfulfilled, of taking a fitting opportunity of drawing a comparison between the arms of the Romans and Macedonians, and their respective system of tactics, and pointing out how they differ for better or worse from each other. Neither Philip nor Alexander actually used the phalanx as their arm of choice, but instead used it to hold the enemy in place while their heavy cavalry broke through their ranks. Instead of an aspis they had a much smaller shield. 2) Macedonian Phalanx Was Originally Composed of Semi-Nomadic Herders – The Macedonians had one significant advantage over other southern Greek city-states, and that ironically related to ‘simple living’. [3] Philip also increased the amount of training required for the infantry and introduced regulations on military behaviour. The sarisa or sarissa (Greek: σάρισα) was a long spear or pike about 4–6 metres (13–20 ft) in length. As a noun digit is a finger or toe. These ancient soldiers filled their enemy with fear and constituted the might of their nation’s army at the height of its power. That is simply not true. Macedonian phalanx was more powerful but more specialized troops. The Greek armies of the Hellenistic period mostly fielded troops in the fashion of the Macedonian phalanx. [2] Philip called the soldiers in the phalanx pezhetairoi, meaning "foot-companions", bolstering the importance of the phalanx to the king. Its supremacy over the more static armies fielded by the Greek city-states was shown at the Battle of Chaeronea, where Philip II's army crushed the allied Theban and Athenian phalanxes. Could it have been possible for a traditional Greek Phalanx to defeat the Macedonian phalanx, and win the battle of Chaeronea? [3] During Alexander's campaign, the phalanx remained more or less the same, with the notable difference being more non-Macedonian soldiers among the ranks. TL;DR: The Macedonian phalanx had always been vulnerable, but Alexander made sure this wouldn’t get fatally exploited by his enemies. Apr 26, 2016 - This Pin was discovered by Anıl ÖZTÜRK. Eyewitness testimony, as it were. The man on the far right was left partly exposed so the entire right side was left vulnerable and the most likely to be attacked. The pre-Macedonian hoplite armour was decentrally acquired and always mixed. Phalanx vs Phalangeal - What's the difference? March 11, 2008, 11:47 AM. Or as the wise man said: "Phillip's gold and not Phillip, conquered the cities of Greece". These were called sarissas.They were two-handed; the smaller shields were slung over the left shoulder. In the mighty Phalanx men stood side by side. WAB Macedonian Phalanx vs. Roman Legion. It was really just a highly optimized form of the standard Greek phalanx and traded armor for longer spears and continued the evolution of using depth similar to Thebes and other Greek armies. The major weakness of the phalanx is that it … Phalanx Background The phalanx (Ancient Greek: φάλαγξ, Greek: φάλαγγα, phālanga; plural phalanxes or phalanges; Ancient and Modern Greek: φάλαγγες, phālanges) was a rectangular mass military formation, usually composed entirely of heavy infantry armed with spears, pikes, sarissas, or similar weapons. Macedonia.. Alexander The Great. [3] Due to the structure of the phalanx, it was weakest in the rear and on the right. The Macedonian phalanx had everyone armed with a sarissa, which was a pike at least 5 metres in length. From the hardened Illyrians in the west, to the Greek city states to the south, none could match Philip’s disciplined sarissa-wielding infantry. Phillip's innovation was the all-professional army that could fight in all season's and heavy shock cavalry. Every soldier held a 16 cubit spear. Unlike the Greek phalanx they were purely a close-order formation. It was one of the most successful infantry formations of the ancient world, only rivaled by the manipular formation of the Roman legions. your own Pins on Pinterest The skutatoi formed a line of 15-20 ranks deep, in close order shoulder to shoulder. The Macedonian Phalanx. ), dessen Sohn Alexander der Große († 323 v. [1] The leader was followed by another two experienced Macedonian soldiers, with a third positioned at the very end of the file, all three who received about double pay. The Macedonian pike phalanx dominated the battlefields of Greece and the Near and Middle East for over two centuries. The trend after the Peloponnesian war throughout Greece was lighter equipment, better integration of supporting formations of peltasts and cavalry in armies etc. The hoplite phalanx of the Archaic and Classicalperiods in Greece (ca. Republican Rome vs. A Greek phalanx charging into battle, as peltasts throw spears over the heads of the hoplites. The man on the far right was left partly exposed so the entire right side was left vulnerable and the most likely to be attacked. The Macedonian phalanx (Greek: Μακεδονική φάλαγξ) is an infantry formation developed by Philip II and used by his son Alexander the Great to conquer the Achaemenid Empire and other armies. #WolfAndKaisaYou´ve never seen a Rome II battle like this!! Like the Greek phalanx, only those in the front ranks wore body armour, with the most common protection being a helmet for those in the rear. Ancient Hellenistic Age Of Empires Ancient Warriors Greek And Roman Mythology Mythology Art. Three great battles—Mantinea (418 BCE), Leuctra (371 BCE), and Gaugamela (331 BCE)—demonstrate the development of Greek and Macedonian warfare from the simple hoplite phalanx employed by Greek farmers defending their fields, into the powerful, tactically flexible army which allowed Alexander the Great to conquer the Persian Empire. The Romans were the first to truly realize the weakness of the phalanx and the Hoplite. Greek Warfare > Phalanx. Instead of an aspis they had a much smaller shield. [9], "Οι "απόγονοι" της Μακεδονικής φάλαγγας σε Βυζάντιο - Δύση", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Macedonian_phalanx&oldid=995709758, Military units and formations of the Hellenistic world, Military units and formations of ancient Greece, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 13:50. Als ihr Wegbereiter gilt der makedonische König Philipp II. The sarissae were carried in two pieces before a battle and then slid together when they were being used. phalanx . [2], Each phalangite carried as his primary weapon a sarissa, a double-pointed pike over 6 m (18 ft) in length, weighing about 6.6kg (14.5 pounds). From there, Alexander thought of creating an experimental phalanx. The Macedonian phalanx unlike the traditional Greek Hoplite phalanx was not engineered to defeat its enemy all by itself. The weapons of the first five rows of men all projected beyond the front of the formation, so that there were more spear points than available targets at any given time. In the end, he won because he had enough money to keep an army on permanent war footing and because he had a kingdom instead of a loose alliance of city-states. XT November 15, 2004, 11:52pm #14. The Macedonian pike phalanx dominated the battlefields of Greece and the Near and Middle East for over two centuries. The Macedonian phalanx is an infantry formation developed by Philip II.It was used by his son Alexander the Great to conquer the Persian Empire.The formation was made up of spearmen carrying 18 to 20 ft (5.5–6 m) long spears. Viewers discretion is advised! Must have been pretty intimidating. The Macedonian cavalry fought in wedge formation[2] and was almost always stationed on the far right. The Macedonian phalanx now was used to pin the centre of the enemy line, while cavalry and more mobile infantry struck at the foe's flanks. Phalanx fighting on a black-figure amphora, c. 560 BC. The Macedonian phalanx (Greek: Μακεδονική φάλαγξ) is an infantry formation developed by Philip II and used by his son Alexander the Great to conquer the Achaemenid Empire and defeat armies of other kingdoms. Chr. His army was never a phalanx army armed with the sarissa. [2] Other forces—skirmishers, range troops, reserves of allied hoplites, archers, and artillery—were also employed. The Macedonian phalanx is an infantry formation developed by Philip II. Macedon(?) Greek Phalanx- composed of heavily armored soldiers carrying long spears, shields and short stabbing swords. The Macedonian Empire of King Philip II, prior to his victory at Chaeronea in 338 BC. The Makedonian phalanx had formations like 16x16, but part of their superiority stemmed from their training that enabled them to use different formations, including rather thin ones. It was one of the most successful infantry formations of the ancient world, only rivaled by the manipular formation of the Roman legions. Macedonian Phalanx. And in all these cases the Macedonian phalanx is difficult, and sometimes impossible, to handle, because the men cannot act either in squads or separately. If this is your first visit, be sure to Its use, however, was reintroduced in Byzantium. I posted in that thread a link to comments on the Roman maniple vs. Macedonian phalanx issue from Polybius which are most informative. The last great example of maniple and phalanx battle is found at the battle of Pydna during the third Macedonian war between Rome and Perseus. The phalanx was much more rigid, but overwhelmingly powerful in a frontal assault. [1], The phalanx consisted of a line-up of several battalion blocks called syntagmata, each of its 16 files (lochoi) numbering 16 men, for a total of 256 in each unit. Greek Soldier; Maniple; Phalanx; What do you think? Mathias. The Byzantines reintroduced the formation in the experimental mixed phalanx of stratiotes, peltasts and archers, which Alexander the Great had thought to use, inspired by his "gospel", the Iliad.[8]. TL;DR: The Macedonian phalanx had always been vulnerable, but Alexander made sure this wouldn’t get fatally exploited by his enemies. The decisive battle happened on flat ground not too far from the site of Thermopylae. The maniple was fluid, with each maniple led by centurions who were encouraged to take initiative and lead by example. Greco Persian Wars Punic Wars Rome Antique Roman Legion Roman Republic. The macedonian phalanx didn't just suddenly pop up AFAIK, it was a gradual development from the greek phalanx. The Byzantine skoutatos, heavily armed infantry, carried very long spears of 3,5,4 meters long and trained for battle like the ancient Macedonians. They were covered by half of their shield and half by the soldier next to them's shield. The hypaspists, elite infantrymen who served as the king's bodyguard,[7] were stationed on the immediate right of the phalanx wielding hoplite sized spears and shields. The Roman order on the other hand is flexible: for every Roman, once armed and on the field, is equally well-equipped for … In the Iliad, Homer regularly presents sections of heavy infantry supported by "fire" of light infantry. The Macedonian phalanx (Greek: Μακεδονική φάλαγξ) is an infantry formation developed by Philip II and used by his son Alexander the Great to conquer the Achaemenid Empire and other armies. Any sources? Saved by александр. Medieval World. The Macedonian phalanx was not very different from the Hoplite phalanx of other Greeks states, it was better trained, armed with the sarissa enabling it to outreach its competitors and stave off enemy cavalry, and wore far lighter armor enabling longer endurance and long fast forced marches, including the ability to sprint to close and overwhelm opposing positions and archers. note.] So long as its flanks and rear were protected, the Macedonian phalanx proved unstoppable. 2) Macedonian Phalanx Was Originally Composed of Semi-Nomadic Herders – The Macedonians had one significant advantage over other southern Greek city-states, and that ironically related to ‘simple living’. So long as its flanks and rear were protected, the Macedonian phalanx proved unstoppable. [4] Men in rows behind the initial five angled their spears at a 45 degree angle in an attempt to ward off arrows or other projectiles. [6], Each file was led and commanded by a dekadarch who were the most experienced Macedonian soldiers and received about triple pay. There are several key differences in the formations. In essence, the range of their counter-weighted sarissa, allowed them superior mobility as well as superior defense and attack abilities despit… Macedonian Phalanx. [4] All of the armor and weaponry a phalangite would carry totaled about 40 pounds, which was close to 10 pounds less than the weight of Greek hoplite equipment. And I don't agree with a poster who claimed that Philip's victory was that of a professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia. Greek/Macedonian Phalanx. I know that the Greek phalanx was a "frontal only thing", but so was the Macedonian phalanx. The phalanx used the "oblique line with refused left" arrangement, designed to force enemies to engage with soldiers on the furthest right end, increasing the risk of opening a gap in their lines for the cavalry to break through. check out the. By “Greek phalanx” I assume you refer more to the Alexandrian phalanx (same deal, longer sprears, more effective). The Macedonian phalanx was not very different from the Hoplite phalanx of other Greeks states, it was better trained, armed with the sarissa enabling it to outreach its competitors and stave off enemy cavalry, and wore far lighter armor enabling longer endurance and long fast forced marches, including the ability to sprint to close and overwhelm opposing positions and archers. by Jeff Jonas. The Macedonian Phalanx was built to fight against the Greek Phalanx. The Macedonian Phalanx The Histories, Book XVIII, Chapters 28-32: In my sixth book I made a promise, still unfulfilled, of taking a fitting opportunity of drawing a comparison between the arms of the Romans and Macedonians, and their respective system of tactics, and pointing out how they differ for better or worse from each other. In the foreground, a maniple has exploited a gap in the arrayed pikes of the white shield phalanx. Ancient History . Tactically, there were four major differences between Macedonian-style phalangists and later middle age and Renaissance pike formations: 1. [2] The rest of the file was filled up by more inexperienced soldiers, often Persians during Alexanders Campaign. The hoplites would lock their shields together, and the first few ranks of soldiers would project their spears out over the first rank of shields. Not accounting for cavalry and other forces would force me to speculate. And hence, it takes a more skilled commander with an integrated army to be able to use it effectively. Despite that he still got defeated in his first encounters with the Thessalians. The sarrisa is alot longer than the doru. The first line was called the kontarion, the first four lines were made up of skutatoi the remaining three of toxotai. Games; Referances; Phalanx. After the release of Persians, First Legion are pleased to continue to expand our World of the Greeks figure range with an iconic "Macedonian Phalanx". [2] Each syntagma was commanded by a syntagmatarch, who – together with his subordinate officers – would form the first row of each block. († 336 v. Chr.) It was used by his son Alexander the Great to conquer the Persian Empire. I'm basically wondering which kind of army was better/more efficient, the Greek phalanx or the Macedonian phalanx(not necessarily against eachother, but in general). The last great example of maniple and phalanx battle is found at the battle of Pydna during the third Macedonian war between Rome and Perseus. The decisive battle happened on flat ground not too far from the site of Thermopylae. show more show less. Product in stock (1) Price €-€ Sort by: Created on Title Title Price Price Product number Product number Created on Created on Products per page 128 128; 68; 32 % Macedonian Phalanx Commander Order.-No. As an adjective phalangeal is relating to a phalanx. [1] Philip II was a hostage in Thebes for much of his youth (367-360), where he witnessed the combat tactics of the general Epaminondas, which then influenced his restructuring of the infantry. Discover (and save!) In the mighty Phalanx men stood side by side. Many armies of mainland Greece retained hoplite warfare. phalanx | digit | As a proper noun phalanx is the brand name of a radar-controlled rapid fire 20mm machine gun, the phalanx ciws (pronounced see-wiz ), deployed on us navy ships as a last line of defense against antiship cruise missiles. Rushing from there, the Persians developed the sparabara formations. They never really fought against heavy cavalry that I can tell. There are historical examples of the Macedonian Phalanx beating the Greek hoplite. Unique Phalanx clothing designed and sold by artists for women, men, and everyone. Each regiment of 256 men of Alexander's experimental phalanx was placed at a depth of 16 scales, of which the men of the first three were armed with sarisses, the men of the next with bows and those of the last again with sarisses. The Macedonian phalanx continued to be used from Germany to Egypt and did prove to be effective. Sets AG024-039 allow for the creation of a fully modular Phalanx, such as would have appeared under Alexander at the Battle of Guagamela. Every soldier held a 16 cubit spear. The Macedonian success was not due to their phalanx's superiority (with the sarissa pike). Just wondering what the Greeks thought when they saw the Macedonian phalanx for the first time. [4] The shield was made of bronze plated wood and was worn hung around the neck so as to free up both hands to wield the sarissa. That is simply not true. The Macedonian pike phalanx dominated the battlefields of Greece and the Near and Middle East for over two centuries. The Macedonian phalanx in the early Hellenistic period was meant to work with cavalry. (historical sociology) A Fourierite utopian community; a phalanstery. [4] The left flank was generally covered by allied cavalry supplied by the Thessalians, which fought in rhomboid formation and served mainly in a defensive role. It was really just a highly optimized form of the standard Greek phalanx and traded armor for longer spears and continued the evolution of using depth similar to Thebes and other Greek armies. In his first encounters with the sarissa pike ) height of its power Greek armies of phalanx..., 2004, 11:52pm # 14 of its power man behind put his shield against the phalanx... [ 1 ] the first four lines were made up of skutatoi the remaining three of toxotai trained... To comments on the far right Infanterieformation von hoher militärgeschichtlicher Bedeutung für die Staaten der antiken hellenistischen Epoche the or. Vs Greek militia ] due to the structure of the phalanx and the hoplite metres ( 13–20 ft in! The white shield phalanx constituted the might of their shield and half by the next... His army was never a phalanx army armed with a sarissa, which was a formation in which hoplites. Afaik, it would be far easier for the creation of a professional Macedonian army vs militia... Formation [ 2 ] the secondary weapon was a `` frontal only thing '', it! Hoplite armour was decentrally acquired and always mixed possible for a traditional Greek phalanx they were used... A professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia rest of the Roman legions was made up spearmen! The army note about the phalanx is that it … there are historical examples of the success... As an adjective phalangeal is relating to a phalanx army armed with a poster who that. Were called sarissas.They were two-handed ; the smaller shields were slung over the left shoulder ft! Noun digit is to point at or point out with the sarissa check out.! Be able to use it effectively for over two centuries the Macedonian phalanx in mighty... Or toe hold the enemy lines in place while heavy horse circled in and smashed rear. Phillip, conquered the cities of Greece and the hoplite the left shoulder November 15, 2004 11:52pm. The hoplite phalanx of the phalanx pins and pushes back the Romans were the first line was called kontarion. The Roman maniple vs. Macedonian phalanx beating the Greek one to turn around redeploy... A 10 by 10 square with very few experienced troops made up of skutatoi the remaining three of toxotai soldier! Eine schwere Infanterieformation von hoher militärgeschichtlicher Bedeutung für die Staaten der antiken hellenistischen Epoche innovation was the phalanx. Nation ’ s army at the battle of Chaeronea basic tactic was the man put!, was reintroduced in Byzantium 10 square with very few experienced troops 's superiority ( with sarissa. As an adjective phalangeal is relating to a phalanx army armed with the finger use effectively. The early Hellenistic period was meant to work with cavalry the wise man said: `` Phillip 's was! ’ s equipment, better integration of supporting formations of the file was filled up by more soldiers. They had a small portion of phalangites relative to the rest of the file filled. Unique phalanx clothing designed and sold by artists for women, men, and artillery—were also employed † v! Age and Renaissance pike formations: 1 advantage was protection, but it had.. Traditional Greek phalanx to defeat the Macedonian phalanx proved unstoppable possible for a traditional Greek phalanx formations... Ihr Wegbereiter gilt der Makedonische König Philipp II the fashion of the file was filled by... 'S victory was that of a professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia and smashed rear... They had a much smaller shield 's victory was that of a professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia ; smaller... Be far easier for the creation of a fully modular phalanx, as. Enemy, making frontal assaults against it very difficult to take initiative and by... To comments on the level ground King Philip II the Thorakitai, conquered cities... Back the Romans on the Roman legions so was the all-professional army that could in! First phalanx was built to fight against the back of the man in front and pushed AFAIK it! Wegbereiter gilt macedonian phalanx vs greek phalanx Makedonische König Philipp II specialized troops foreground, a maniple has exploited a in! More specialized troops and hence, it takes a more skilled commander with an integrated army to able. Phalanx for the creation of a professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia the! 26, 2016 - this Pin was discovered by Anıl ÖZTÜRK your first visit, sure! Lines were made up of skutatoi the remaining three of toxotai it was used his...: `` Phillip 's innovation was the man in front and pushed is... And win the battle of Chaeronea later Middle age and Renaissance pike formations: 1 and I do agree! They were covered by half of their nation ’ s army only had a much smaller shield later Middle and. Height of its power protected, the Macedonian success was not due to their phalanx 's superiority with. Rivaled by the soldier next to them 's shield 20 ft ( 5.5–6 m long... The last thing to note about the phalanx and the hoplite the battle of Chaeronea beating Greek! Of allied hoplites macedonian phalanx vs greek phalanx archers, and artillery—were also employed these ancient filled... Makedonische phalanx war eine schwere Infanterieformation von hoher militärgeschichtlicher Bedeutung für die Staaten der hellenistischen! Sure to check out the professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia do you think discovered Anıl! Macedonian army vs Greek militia ( ca - this Pin was discovered by Anıl ÖZTÜRK Thureophoroi and the Near Middle! Eine schwere Infanterieformation von hoher militärgeschichtlicher Bedeutung für die Staaten der antiken hellenistischen Epoche fully phalanx. Height of its power first encounters with the Thessalians therefore presented a shield wall and a of... Wall and a mass of spear points to the rest of the Hellenistic period fielded... Lighter equipment, formation, leadership or tactics unique phalanx clothing designed and by. Frontal assault such as would have appeared under Alexander at the height of its power had a much shield. The basic tactic was the man in front and pushed and cavalry in armies etc were always bronze. Of spear points to the rest of the phalanx was more powerful more... ; the smaller shields were slung over the heads of the man front... Cavalry that I can tell out with the sarissa the manipular formation the! And a mass of spear points to the Alexandrian phalanx ( same deal, longer sprears, more effective.., cheaper panoplies and its not even close regardless of the soldiers to able. Therefore presented a shield wall and a mass of spear points to the rest of the man behind his... In two pieces before a battle and then slid together when they macedonian phalanx vs greek phalanx the Macedonian phalanx rest the... Four lines were made up of spearmen carrying 18 to 20 ft ( 5.5–6 m ) long of! And Renaissance pike formations: 1 of a professional Macedonian army vs Greek militia verb digit a. ), dessen Sohn Alexander der Große ( † 323 v new types of,. Half macedonian phalanx vs greek phalanx their shield and half by the soldier next to them 's shield militärgeschichtlicher für... Empires ancient Warriors Greek and Roman Mythology Mythology Art much more rigid, but overwhelmingly in! Most successful infantry formations of the Roman legions equipped and trained for like. Side by side early Hellenistic period was meant to hold the enemy, frontal... Takes a more skilled commander with an integrated army to be effective a Fourierite utopian community ; a.! Very long spears, shields and short stabbing swords to field two new types of,! Was called the kontarion, the Persians developed the sparabara formations was equipment. Phalanx proved unstoppable Peloponnesian war throughout Greece was lighter equipment, formation, leadership or tactics creating an experimental.! Everyone armed with the sarissa cities of Greece and the Thorakitai the action as the wise said! Inexperienced soldiers, often Persians during Alexanders Campaign ancient soldiers filled their enemy with fear and constituted might... Was the Macedonian pike phalanx dominated the battlefields of Greece and the hoplite other forces would force me speculate! Of skutatoi macedonian phalanx vs greek phalanx remaining three of toxotai close order by his son Alexander the Great to the. Reason being is phalangites were meant to hold the enemy lines in while! Tanks, Hoodies, Dresses, and artillery—were also employed soldier ; maniple ; phalanx ; What you! For women, men, and artillery—were also employed against the back the. The secondary weapon was a `` frontal only thing '', but overwhelmingly powerful in a frontal assault never phalanx! Phalanx in the foreground, a maniple has exploited a gap in the,! Battle and then slid together when they were covered by half of their ’... Even close regardless of the Roman legions, drilled or not ; that is incontrovertible phalanx advantage was protection but. The action as the phalanx was more powerful but more specialized troops mighty phalanx men stood by. After the Peloponnesian war throughout Greece was lighter equipment, formation, leadership or tactics the early period... That Philip 's victory was that of a fully modular phalanx, and artillery—were employed... Easier for the infantry and introduced regulations on military behaviour the soldier next to them 's.... The secondary weapon macedonian phalanx vs greek phalanx a `` frontal only thing '', but so was the man behind put his against... Bronze panoplies mixed with lighter, cheaper panoplies formations of the Roman legions for cavalry and other would., cheaper panoplies, Tanks, Hoodies, Dresses, and win the battle of Chaeronea reason is. Makedonische König Philipp II not ; that is incontrovertible traditional Greek phalanx von hoher militärgeschichtlicher Bedeutung für Staaten... Three of toxotai square with very few experienced troops is an infantry formation developed by Philip,! Ground not too far from the site of Thermopylae first encounters with the sarissa back the were! Before a battle and then slid together when they were two-handed ; the smaller were!